Intimate Partner Violence and Domestic Abuse as Sub-Types of Spiritual Abuse

By Dr. Yusuf Malik Frederick, PhD
Black Crescent Wellness Foundation

🕯️ Introduction: The Hidden Trauma Within Faith

At the Black Crescent Wellness Foundation, our research continues illuminating the often-overlooked intersections between faith, identity, and trauma. One of the most pressing yet underexamined areas is the link between Spiritual Abuse (SA) and Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) in American Muslim communities. While SA has increasingly become a subject of psychological inquiry, its subtypes—particularly domestic violence and IPV rooted in religious contexts—demand more urgent and nuanced attention.

📚 Understanding Spiritual Abuse and Its Subtypes

Spiritual abuse occurs when religious beliefs or leadership are weaponized to control, manipulate, or inflict harm on individuals. It becomes especially insidious in domestic environments, where faith is used to justify psychological, physical, or emotional violence within intimate partnerships. In Muslim communities, this form of abuse often remains invisible, shielded by cultural taboos, religious misinterpretations, and systemic patriarchy (Chowdhury & Winder, 2022; Siddiqui & Noor, 2022).

🧕 American Muslim Communities and the Complex Reality of IPV

Although American Muslims make up about 1% of the U.S. population, they are disproportionately spotlighted in media portrayals of domestic violence, accounting for nearly 10% of such stories (Ali et al., 2022). This skewed visibility reinforces damaging stereotypes, obscuring the fact that DV/IPV rates among Muslims are consistent with national averages (Kulwicki & Miller, 1999; Alkhateeb, 1999).

Notable studies have shown:

  • 18–20% of Muslim women in Dearborn, MI, experienced spousal abuse (Kulwicki & Miller, 1995).
  • A 1993 survey estimated that 10% of Muslim women and children experienced physical abuse (Alkhateeb, 1999).
  • A 2007 Sound Vision study found 31.5% of Muslims reported physical abuse, while 40% experienced verbal abuse at home.

These figures are consistent with national statistics showing that 1 in 3 women in the U.S. experience physical domestic violence, with 48.4% reporting emotional abuse (Ali et al., 2022).

⚖️ The Role of Religion in Abuse and Silence

Islamic teachings introduced radical improvements in women’s rights centuries ago. However, patriarchal interpretations and cultural customs continue to distort these teachings, enabling coercive control and religiously justified abuse (Siddiqui & Noor, 2021; Jayasundara et al., 2014). In many cases:

  • Male perpetrators use religious texts to validate dominance and obedience.
  • Victims are discouraged from seeking legal or psychological help.
  • Faith leaders prioritize family unity over survivor safety (Gezinski et al., 2019; Hulley et al., 2023).

Religious environments often foster internal conflicts for survivors, who may struggle with both their spiritual identity and their safety. In some cases, increased religiosity is prescribed as a solution rather than trauma-informed support (Powell & Pepper, 2021).

🧩 IPV as a Form of Spiritual Abuse

Scholars now argue that Intimate Partner Violence constitutes a distinct subtype of spiritual abuse when:

  • Religious narratives are used to justify harm.
  • Victims are shamed into silence by religious or communal pressures.
  • Faith-based justifications are employed to deny access to money, mobility, or medical care (Chowdhury, 2023; Bagwell-Gray et al., 2021).

These patterns are not exclusive to Islam. Research across Christianity (Oakley & Humphreys, 2019), Judaism (Adelman, 2001; Kalvari, 2022), and Islam (Ghafournia, 2017) reveals that abusers in religious communities often use sacred texts and clergy endorsement to reinforce control.

🌍 Systemic Power and Religious Justification

The abuse dynamic is further complicated when religious leaders themselves are abusers, or when they refuse to intervene, citing scriptural or cultural reasons (Mulvihill et al., 2023; Eidhamar, 2018).

One example of this is found in Orthodox Judaism, where a woman requires her husband’s consent for divorce via a get. Abusers can withhold this consent to exert coercive control (Gueta & Levy Ladell, 2024)—a practice now recognized as religious IPV.

🧠 Psychological Impact and Barriers to Support

Victims of religious IPV often experience:

  • Deep spiritual confusion
  • Isolation from religious communities
  • Fear of divine punishment
  • Limited access to culturally competent services

Survivors may be told to:

  • Be more patient or pious
  • Stay for the sake of children
  • Avoid shaming the community

This guidance is not only unhelpful—it is harmful (Chaudhry, 2020; Gezinski et al., 2019). The absence of faith-sensitive and trauma-informed services further discourages reporting and help-seeking.

🔎 Why Research Matters: Toward Solutions

There is a critical need for further research into how American Muslim survivors of IPV navigate spiritual abuse. Future studies should:

  • Investigate how religious justifications are employed in abusive homes.
  • Explore how survivors reconcile faith and trauma.
  • Examine the role of religious leaders in enabling or challenging abuse.

A faith-based but survivor-centered approach is necessary to empower Muslim women while engaging with sacred traditions in contextually meaningful ways (Hammer, 2019; Istratii & Ali, 2023).

Recommendations for Action

At Black Crescent Wellness Foundation, we advocate for:

  1. Culturally and religiously competent DV services
  2. Clergy training on abuse identification and referral
  3. Community education that challenges patriarchal misinterpretations
  4. Survivor-led faith healing circles and trauma recovery programs

We aim to foster spiritual safety and psychological healing spaces, where survivors are not forced to choose between their faith and their freedom.


📚 References (APA Style)

Abu-Ras, W., & Suárez, Z. E. (2021). Domestic violence among Muslim Americans: Religious, cultural, and legal barriers to help-seeking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(23-24), 11327–11354.

Adelman, M. (2001). No way out: Divorce-related domestic violence in Israel. Violence Against Women, 7(10), 1224–1256.

Adjei, S. B., & Mpiani, A. (2022). Spiritual abuse and religious power: A Ghanaian perspective. Journal of Religion and Health, 61(1), 45–61.

Ali, S. R., Hussein, M., & Smith, D. L. (2022). Muslim Americans and domestic violence: Dissecting the data and media portrayals. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 16(2), 71–90.

Alkhateeb, M. (1999). Ending domestic violence in Muslim communities. North American Council for Muslim Women.

Bagwell-Gray, M., Messing, J. T., & Baldwin-White, A. (2021). Coercive control and spirituality: IPV within faith-based contexts. Journal of Family Violence, 36(4), 453–467.

Chaudhry, A. S. (2020). Islam, intimate partner violence, and patriarchy in the U.S. Feminist Theology, 28(2), 163–179.

Chowdhury, A. A. (2023). Patriarchy and religious abuse: A qualitative study of Muslim survivors. Journal of Gender Studies, 32(1), 59–76.

Chowdhury, A. A., & Winder, A. (2021). Understanding domestic abuse through an Islamic lens. Religion and Society, 14(2), 39–58.

Eidhamar, L. G. (2018). Religious leaders’ responses to IPV in Muslim communities. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 31(2), 134–150.

Ellis, M., Thompson, R., & Garcia, L. (2022). Clergy response to intimate partner violence: Insights across faiths. Journal of Family Issues, 43(8), 1950–1972.

Gezinski, L. B., Gonzalez-Pons, K. M., & Rogers, R. (2019). Faith-based barriers and facilitators in IPV recovery. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(9), 1963–1986.

Ghafournia, N. (2017). Muslim women and domestic violence: Developing a framework for social work practice. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work, 36(1-2), 146–163.

Gueta, K., & Levy Ladell, L. (2024). Religious coercion in divorce: Jewish women’s perspectives. Journal of Gender & Religion, 29(1), 23–45.

Hammer, J. (2019). Peaceful families: American Muslim efforts against domestic violence. Princeton University Press.

Hassouneh, D., & Kulwicki, A. (2022). Intimate partner violence and Muslim women’s health. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 43(7), 597–606.

Hulley, L., Warin, M., & Veitch, J. (2023). Religious leaders and IPV: Pathways of support or silence? Journal of Religion and Abuse, 19(3), 233–248.

Istratii, R., & Ali, S. (2021). Religion, gender, and violence: Cross-contextual insights. Gender & Development, 29(3), 493–510.

Jayasundara, D., et al. (2014). Intersections of religion and IPV: Insights from South Asian communities. Violence and Victims, 29(6), 1005–1021.

Kalvari, D. (2022). Jewish legal frameworks and gendered control in divorce. Journal of Religion and Gender Studies, 12(1), 88–105.

Kulwicki, A., & Miller, J. (1995). Domestic violence in the Arab American community. Women’s Health Issues, 5(4), 186–192.

Lock, L. R. (2018). Sacred texts and the legitimization of IPV. Feminist Theology, 26(2), 190–204.

Mulvihill, N., Brown, E., & Lightowlers, C. (2023). Clergy, gender, and power in spiritual abuse contexts. Violence Against Women, 29(2), 142–164.

Oakley, L., & Humphreys, C. (2019). Clergy responses to domestic violence in Christian communities. Child Abuse Review, 28(4), 276–289.

Powell, T., & Pepper, C. (2021). Faith, coercion, and gendered harm. Journal of Family Violence, 36(3), 297–309.

Sharifnia, S., Sadeghi, N., & Ghaffari, H. (2023). Patriarchy, faith, and violence in Iranian Muslim households. Middle East Women’s Studies, 19(2), 110–125.

Siddiqui, A., & Noor, N. (2021). Gender justice and domestic violence in Islamic discourse. Islamic Studies Journal, 60(1), 45–70.

Tomalin, E. (2023). Gender, religion, and human rights in domestic violence responses. Global Studies Review, 6(1), 22–39.

Truong, S., & Ghafournia, N. (2024). Psychological control in religious IPV contexts. Journal of Gender Violence, 14(1), 89–108. Williams, L., & Jenkins, T. (2019). Domestic violence and spiritual silence in the Black church. Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling, 73(3), 129–136.